Archive for the ‘sf’ Category
(I’ve decided, partially inspired by this post, that I’m going to start writing up mini-reviews of most everything that I read on here. I’m doing this because far too much good reading time dribbles away into blog reading, email writing etc. I’m at a point in my life where 1) I have no time to read anything that’s not course / writing related but where 2) I really do need to get a huge amount and eclectic variety of reading done away from course and writing prep… Maybe doing this will help me along…)
Only read the preface and the chapters that directly deal with Wells (who I’m working on right at the moment). Most of the material here seems both foundational and somewhat dated. I enjoyed the short description of the context in which most of this was conceived – the dual “anti-capitalist and anti-Stalinist struggle” of 1950s-1960s Yugoslav literary academia (x-xi). When I read stuff like this, I can’t help but think of how different it must have been to live and do humanities work in a world in which there was actually-existing bipolarity – a world in which Marxism would be something other than a perversely nostalgic mode of preservation.
Interesting thought about the relationship between literary morphology and social change, and the sense that the twentieth-century suffers from a form of blockage that has to do with the potential, though not yet actualized, possibility of proletarian dominance. Science Fiction, and other “low” forms, simly can’t become properly hegemonic because of geopolitical rigidites.
The Wells’s sections do a decent job contextualizing his utopian work and then reading The Time Machine quite closely, with an eye to the clash between Wells’s fictional form (dependent as it is upon the dramatization of what the Traveller sees) and Victorian / Bourgeois faith in progress, Social-Darwinism, etc.
There are moments when Suvin deploys provocative questions – such as, for instance, the sense that that “principle of a Wellsian structure of science fiction is mutation of scientific into aesthetic cognition” (232-3) – without adequately following up on the question itself.
In sum, not all that helpful for me. But an excellent general resource for the exploration of Wellsian and pre-Wellsian utopia. The bibliography itself is worth the price of admission.