A pictorial illustration of Adorno, Aesthetic Theory, 3-4:
“Just as Rimbaud’s stunning dictum one hundred years ago devined definitively the history of new art, his later silence, his stepping into line as an employee, anticipated art’s decline.”
Written by adswithoutproducts
June 25, 2006 at 11:47 pm
Posted in aesthetics, literature, work and unemployment
Subscribe to comments with RSS.
Adorno relies on cliché to describe Rimbaud’s African experience–perhaps he, hermit that he was, had not heard the news of Etiemble’s Le Mythe de Rimbaud.
Jonathan
June 26, 2006 at 11:41 am
Which myth, in particular, do you think Adorno’s repeating? Is it “employee” that has you bothered, Jonathan?
I mean, the guy did write poetry and then quit to go to Africa, no?
AWP
June 26, 2006 at 12:10 pm
He wasn’t exactly working at a bank or insurance company, you know. “Stepping into line” doesn’t describe his colonial career terribly well.
Jonathan
June 26, 2006 at 2:39 pm
I’ve not read the Etiemble, but it wasn’t my impression that this was the sort of myth he was invested in debunking. Rather, Rimbaud as perverse prophetical homosexual saint….
Does he really debunk the myth of Rimbaud as sold out Kurtz-in-reverse?
AWP
June 27, 2006 at 1:13 am
He debunks pretty much everything you’ve ever read about Rimbaud (including, proleptically, subsequent English-language criticism), some things more coherently than others (three or four volumes this goes on).
There was no sudden renunciation. Rimbaud’s African career was extraodinary, by any measure (note the hieratic and menacing pose of the figure on the right), a pathetic actualization of the Saison‘s career plans, though certainly not a conscious one. I’ve read Aesthetic Theory, in what was, in retrospect, an extraordinarily ambitious graduate seminar; and if I could find my copy on the currently disarrayed shelves I’m sure I would see an outraged scribble next to that unfortunately vague recapitulative comparision.
The statement you quote in the title has always seemed to me to be more mocking than disposing.
Jonathan
June 27, 2006 at 11:53 am