<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: an &#8220;iPod government&#8221; vs. the EITC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adswithoutproducts.com/2008/05/05/an-ipod-government-vs-the-eitc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adswithoutproducts.com/2008/05/05/an-ipod-government-vs-the-eitc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://adswithoutproducts.com/2008/05/05/an-ipod-government-vs-the-eitc/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adswithoutproducts.com/2008/05/05/an-ipod-government-vs-the-eitc/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Any worthwhile 'socialist' project should also take on the byzantine regulatory complex of neoliberalism, which is frequently a direct product of the center-left's approach to statism. In terms of concrete good, it's one way in which 'conservatism' - as an approach to problem solving rather than as an ideology - sometimes bests center-lefty interventionism, which has a tendency to perfectionism and often holds the idea that their illusions of control are realizable via bureaucracy. 

Even a more conservative platform of the Obama/iPod style is likely to do more to help people than Clinton's bureaucratic (perfectionist, technocratic) approach, which fails to account for the huge transaction costs of compliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any worthwhile &#8217;socialist&#8217; project should also take on the byzantine regulatory complex of neoliberalism, which is frequently a direct product of the center-left&#8217;s approach to statism. In terms of concrete good, it&#8217;s one way in which &#8216;conservatism&#8217; - as an approach to problem solving rather than as an ideology - sometimes bests center-lefty interventionism, which has a tendency to perfectionism and often holds the idea that their illusions of control are realizable via bureaucracy. </p>
<p>Even a more conservative platform of the Obama/iPod style is likely to do more to help people than Clinton&#8217;s bureaucratic (perfectionist, technocratic) approach, which fails to account for the huge transaction costs of compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
